![ImperiumUltimum](/img/default-banner.jpg)
- 56
- 1 021 218
ImperiumUltimum
Приєднався 15 гру 2009
Philip Sherrard: His Life & Work
The Thoughts of Bishop Kallistos Ware.
Interviewer: David Cadman.
temenosacademy.org
deniseharveypublisher.gr/people/philip-sherrard
worldwisdom.com/public/authors/Philip-Sherrard.aspx
mikrotheos.blogspot.com/2011/09/blog-post_25.html
Interviewer: David Cadman.
temenosacademy.org
deniseharveypublisher.gr/people/philip-sherrard
worldwisdom.com/public/authors/Philip-Sherrard.aspx
mikrotheos.blogspot.com/2011/09/blog-post_25.html
Переглядів: 9 541
Відео
Kallistos Ware: The Jesus Prayer & Hesychasm (2/2)
Переглядів 10 тис.10 років тому
His Eminence Metropolitan Kallistos of Diokleia discusses the Jesus Prayer in the context of Hesychasm. Institute for Orthodox Christian Studies, Cambridge, 15th of November 2008.
Kallistos Ware: The Jesus Prayer & Hesychasm (1/2)
Переглядів 46 тис.10 років тому
His Eminence Metropolitan Kallistos of Diokleia discusses the Jesus Prayer in the context of Hesychasm. Institute for Orthodox Christian Studies, Cambridge, 15th of November 2008.
The Metaphysical and Cosmological Roots of the Ecological Crisis
Переглядів 12 тис.10 років тому
Seyyed Hossein Nasr speaks on "The Metaphysical and Cosmological Roots of the Ecological Crisis." Guest Lecture Series, Lindisfarne in Manhattan 1976/1977 Schumacher Center, a Lindisfarne talk.
Joseph Epes Brown: A Mountain
Переглядів 1,3 тис.10 років тому
The following excerpt, A Mountain, is from a keynote address Joseph gave in October of 1984 at Carroll College on how our religious traditions influence our views of the environment.
Knowledge and the Sacred
Переглядів 17 тис.11 років тому
Seyyed Hossein Nasr, Hamline University 1985. This lecture of Knowledge and the Sacred was given upon request of Huston Smith when he taught at Hamline University in Minneapolis. Professor Nasr's lecture is based upon his book, Knowledge and the Sacred, which was a compilation of material from his Gifford Lectures.
The 'True Man': Myth or Reality?
Переглядів 8 тис.11 років тому
Jean-Louis Michon A rare autobiographical glimpse into the life of this respected Sufi octogenarian presenter, and his personal reminiscences and insights into the True Men he has known (including René Guénon, Frithjof Schuon, Titus Burckhardt, and Thomas Yellowtail, among others) Tradition in the Modern World: Sacred Web 2006 Conference - 2 disc DVD set worldwisdom.com/public/products/97819333...
Frithjof Schuon: Primordial Man
Переглядів 14 тис.11 років тому
An excerpt from the 2 DVD Set containing a 115 minute documentary on the life of Frithjof Schuon, and an additional 80 minutes of special features. Available at worldwisdom.com
Frithjof Schuon: Eastern Orthodox Church
Переглядів 12 тис.11 років тому
An excerpt from the 2 DVD Set containing a 115 minute documentary on the life of Frithjof Schuon, and an additional 80 minutes of special features. Available at worldwisdom.com
Schuon's Audience
Переглядів 2,4 тис.12 років тому
Mark Perry, Patrick Laude and Seyyed Hossein Nasr discuss Schuon's writings and audience.
Human Origins and Destinies According to the Great Religions of the World
Переглядів 9 тис.12 років тому
Human Origins and Destinies According to the Great Religions of the World
Towards the Musica Perennis - Sir John Tavener
Переглядів 44 тис.12 років тому
Towards the Musica Perennis - Sir John Tavener
Dark Green Religion and Deep Ecology
Переглядів 4,6 тис.12 років тому
Dark Green Religion and Deep Ecology
Traditional Action in the Contemporary World
Переглядів 14 тис.12 років тому
Traditional Action in the Contemporary World
Sergio Yahya Pallavicini: Traditionalism and Esotericism in Islam [Eng/Rus]
Переглядів 3,1 тис.12 років тому
Sergio Yahya Pallavicini: Traditionalism and Esotericism in Islam [Eng/Rus]
Against Post-Modern World: Dugin's Speech on Chaos [Rus/Eng]
Переглядів 2,8 тис.12 років тому
Against Post-Modern World: Dugin's Speech on Chaos [Rus/Eng]
For Christ sake, why did you post this video that is only 43 seconds long!!? Where's the rest on the interview?
It's as if we're looking at our destiny upon the plane of forms itself.
Schuon gave in to petty individualism, ecumenism and crazy syncretism. He became delusional as he could not see himself as what he really was or should be. He is a very sketchy writer, and doctrinally weak, as he doesn't even fully understand the difference between the exoteric and the esoteric point of view. Guénon on the other hand is the bestower of the pure, untainted Traditional doctrine, true esoterism, as far as it allows itself to be transmitted in a written form. He is doctrinally perfect, uncompromising and free of individualistic taint, not to mention a devout, good and kind hearted man. There is no possible comparison between them. What Lings intends to say is that Schuon really goes more into detail on exoteric side of things, while Guenón stays more strictly in the esoterism. That's what he means when he says that "there is much in Schuon that cannot be found in Guenón". Yet, as I've already said, Lings was far from being a reliable matter in this issue, as he took Schuon's side in the split, even betraying Guenón's trust (something I won't go into right now). For instance, the part of that statement that says that "everything that is in Guenón is also in Schuon" is simply and verifiably false. To name only a few things, there is an absolute absence in Schuon's writings about anything regarding the King of the World (and the fact the some of his followers went on a trip looking for Agartha only goes to show the absurd level of their ignorance on this matter), and also almost nothing regarding the institutional, systematic character of initiation, or of initiatic order for that matter. His writings are also significantly lacking when it comes to traditional symbolism when compared to Guenón, and even more lacking when it comes to criticism of the modern world and pseudo-religions. He also never fully understood some key differences between exoterism and esoterism (such as the difference between mysticism and initiation, which really is laughable for someone claiming to be a spiritual master). His writings can only compare with Guenón's in terms of Metaphysics, but even then with severe reservations. He's more of a comparative religion scholar than anything, besides the whole "cult" fiasco. Now, the other part of Lings' statement, that there are things in Schuon that aren't present in Guenón, may have some truth to it, but even then it must be qualified: because here he is referring to Schuon's writings on exoterism and spiritual guidance, things Guenón never intended to do. But then again, what is the value of that coming from a traditionalist, when we already have the saints and sages of each exoteric form (traditional religion) to provide us with it? What we need from traditionalists is to reveal the esoteric Tradition within the particular traditional forms, and not to take their places! So, all in all, I wouldn't say Schuon has much going for him over Guenón at all. Of course, you could point out to Schuon's practical function as a shaykh, spiritual master, that put him in a more direct relation in regards to the spiritual Work of others in itself, but it suffices to take a quick glance at his "tariqah" and what became of it to realize how that failed on all accounts, turning into a firepit of deceit, lies and scandal (be it from accusers or defenders). That is not in small part due to his doctrinal errors and individual insufficiencies of course, which we crystallized through superbia and pride. Schuon should've taken Guenón as a master and continued his work as a faithful disciple, but his western individualistic temperament got the better of him, and he only got worse with time. He was wrong on every account in the pseudo-intellectual fiasco of a book that he shamelessly released on Guenón's centenary as polemics against him (trying to "correct" him, as you say, and erring, missing the point, or shamelessly and gratuitously attacking him at every turn), and that's not to mention his ever increasing scandals and lunacies. The traditionalists that followed more closely the directions Guenón had pointed are much more interesting, such as Michel Valsan and others, but they are much unknown in the anglophone world, even for traditionalist standards. Ananda Coomaraswamy was much closer to what Schuon should've been from the beginning, apart from his special "function" of Spiritual Master and initiator in the West of course, which made his orthodoxy that much more crucial and necessary, and his heterodoxy that much more destructive. Lings, unfortunately, it's obviously not a reliable source on this matter, as he was always a fanatical partisan of Schuon from the beginning. Also, it must be said, one can only laugh upon hearing Lings talk about how some of Guénon's writings are "unpublisheable" because of supposed "mistakes", especially when one knows that he, as the editor of the English version Guénon's Symbols of the Sacred Science, adulterated and censored some of Guénon's paragraphs to render them more in line woth Schuon's views! He really shows his true colors when he says that; as a fanatical schuonian, Guénon's "mistakes" to him are anything that is not in agreement with Schuon, and that is certainly no trustworthy way of determining the truth of the matter (specially when you consider how many errors are published in Schuon's work and carrer as a spiritual master in general, most of them arriving from his divergence from Guénon, and still his followers kept silent). Now why can't one simply be faithful to what Guénon wrote and publish it as it is and, if one wishes, commenting on it later, but rather dogmatically censor it is beyond me. And it is doubtful that what Lings considers "mistakes" would be considered as such by Guénon himself. It suffices to read his correspondence to get a sense of this. oeuvre-de-rene-guenon.blogspot.com/2019/02/la-fonction-de-frithjof-schuon.html?m=1 archive.org/details/refutation-des-quelques-critiques-de-f.-schuon/page/n29/mode/1up archive.org/details/c-1970-80-sources-dossier-sg-vol-2_202307/Poulat
Hello, thank you for this. May I ask a couple things? Who else besides Michel Valsan would you recommend reading? And, is the Sophia Perennis edition of Symbols of Sacred Science (with James Richard Wetmore as editor) reliable? My French is still rather sloppy, you see.
Best answer from the blessed mouth of Primordial Man HimSelf about HimSelf. Aptly called the 'Seal of the Sages'.
Looking at these paintings I feel something. I feel like a sleeper agent and these paintings are like awakening me or something.
it's called schizophrenia.😜
ancestral memory
Highly symbolic, highly archetypal. A mystery unfolding, ourselves within it.
anyone who has even the slightest contact with islam is a madman
A bowl of manure, topped with the freshest whipped cream, does not constitute dessert. Eastern Orthodoxy is that. Tradition had taken over sacred scripture to where even godless religions, in Tavener's naivete are equal to Christianity...
A hungarian song playing over some Karadzic goons surreal art, yeah I can assure you this is a drugtrip at 2 am.
Powerful lecture and such great insights on Guenon and Schuon.
ESTA MUSICA ME HIZO LLORAR
The text goes too fast for me to read it. I find myself having to pause all the time.
But still pray to a man . This man confines the way to truth inside his silos
Haha😅 man’s intellection can’t reach the absolute, and it needs revelation, way and work to get understanding
Most of the information I’ve seen so far as related to Perennialism so far has primarily highlighted Genon and Frizjoff… how or why did this discussion become so engrossed with Evola is a bit puzzling and has somehow painted quite a grim picture overall on the topic of Perennialism. Whether this was the intention or not.. that is difficult to say. Bit disappointing meanwhile. I had not perceived Evola as a prominent figure in Perennial philosophy at least not a very positive one.
“To be human is to be divine.” ― Seyyed Hossein Nasr (55:40)
Great stuff
Hail
Ride the Tiger, you can see his stripes but you know he's clean, oh don't you see what I mean!
I do the inner voice.
My favorite tipe of art
Bravo! Istina
Per sempre 4:15
Intellect+ heart. Rhe self : dispassion+ stillness+ peace.. Then the invocation
The Jesus prayer is for the beginners, just to focus the mind and invoke energy of bliss. Then when the self starts awaken and moves on towards other atomic worlds, ( uncreated light) experience different levels of illumination, understanding, and mastering. The goal is through continues experience to achieve detachment, dispassion, so he, she can purified. Then illumination, and different stages of union with different reality States. From ego center personality, towards unity center reality.the pure consciousness is starting evolving. Freedom from the lower and attachment to the higher.
Im not crying we will win
Shaykh Nasr is a rare Islamic sufi saint of the 21st century. It is to our benefit that we are privileged to access his lecture & teachings during this era.
Gold.
База
from a old pro church musician who knows about breathing and praying and sometimes chewing gum and walking....can't do any of that without Gods help. so delighted to meet Bishop Ware at last even if only 8 biblical days past. He was looking in better shape than my Orthodox Study Bible with his editing between the duct tape.
serbians and japans not Aryan but Beautiful Arts!
Since "Aryan" in orthodox racialism meant any Indo-European Europeans and since 8% of Denmark's population is of migrant origin (meaning Serbia is most likely objectively more racially homogeneous) I'd say they are pretty "Aryan" according to traditional racialist doctrine.
EU is definitely not Aryan
Fantastic
Hvala vladiki Nikolaju i nasem dragom Nebojsi na ovom bogatstvu koje izlivaju zajedno u nase duse ❤
The original schitzo
Obrigado por postar.
ua-cam.com/video/Ee_P4O2gLOI/v-deo.html
ironically, looks like AI art
A great man
Somehow, I just knew, before clicking on this video, that the music would be some sort of "badass" repetitive drumbeat. Is it so soon forgotten that the attraction of the vulgar is diametrically opposed to Traditionalism...? haha (pseudo intellectual here)
its 12yo video lol , it was standard back then to put this music on everything "dramatic"
Ibn Arabi, al-Hallaj, Abdul Qadir al-Jilani, Guénon, Meister Eckhardt, Shankara Charya... and all true Gnostics from time immemorial have had crucial ideas the opposite of Frithjof Schuon's. Read about THEIR ideas here: Frithjof Schuon: A last minute lesson in discernment And I swear that I tell the whole truth, so help me God. If I lie or calumniate anyone, may I and my most loved ones be cursed like Muhammad swore concerning the delegation from Najran.
I think you are focusing on details which are not the point with Frithsjof Schuon. His goal is to speak to the modern world, the modern man about returning to a traditional world, realizing oneself by spirituality, and all these principles. As for the specificities that you are mentionning, in the current state of the world today, it really is secondary. We are talking about people who never dedicate in their life one or two weeks per year to spirituality, prayer etc. What difference these details would make for them ?
My ancestor :)
How true😊
his opinions on the relative aspects of spirituality are really so stupid and primitive, but this one really is an example of what keeps my interest in schuon alive
Maybe you just don’t have that capacity to understand
@@Falcon_Serbia he claims to represent universalism but simultaneously states there is a dualism between semitic "subjectivism" and "aryan" metaphysics
primitive is good the best!
дивно!!!
RIP
RIP
Astonishing and superb. May God reward him infinitely with the sight of His face. AMEEN.
God is in Nunawading to end Glutencancer
Uncompromising Traditional Catholicism. The only way left. The only way out. The revolution begins within.
20:30
36:33 mutual influence with sufism/Islam on the Jesus prayer...